I've written a book about the history of poverty in England. The poverty we see in India and the poverty found in England may vary widely. However, in the country of colonial rulers who ruled themselves for a long time, the five-year-old laws there are, for everyone, especially the poorest of India, know what kind of suffering the poor have been. It is free to know that the policies of the imperialist poor are influenced by the fact that the poverty in India has been influenced by its economic development blueprint.
Elizabeth Queen's Law of Poor People 'received a comprehensive form in 1906. The East India Company has got a trade agreement with India within a few months. This is a signal that the laws of India and England are interconnected, though it is a contingency. After so many years, we have opened up for globalization. Globalization gave a new life to a constrained economic theory that lost its image. Even so, India has not been able to get out of the tangled fingers with England.
The attitude of England to the poor in the business and industrial era has been the emergence of today's globalization. This has made England stand out for the poor. Those who uphold this position now are not international corporations or poverty abolitionists or sympathetic to poverty across India and elsewhere. The poverty eradication of all of them is a lesson that internationally needs to talk about the goals of the century.
Now the people of the middle class are the ones who take on England the worst of the poor. These middle-class people are far beyond their poverty. When it is said in Western terminology, it is a new bourgeois dawn that is recognized as its indicator. One argument states that rulers originate from this middle class, the frames needed for the judiciary are ready, the necessary agreements take place, and the legitimate administration required for any civilian system. But this argument does not emphasize that the same middle class rides on the poor. This new middle class is strict enough to ensure that the facility, which has a small amount, can not be abandoned. For this middle class, the main beneficiary of the flow of development, in the flood of development, it is important for the poor to penetrate into the atmosphere and not to get rid of it.
Therefore, the lack of intolerance, prejudice, and hatred of the poor is what we get from political debates, not in the reports of international aid organizations, volunteers, or by the representatives of ancient mercy on the poor. This disgusting smoke is now rising in splendid suburbs, comfortable interior interiors, cushioned leather sofa, glass table, magnetic floor and drawing rooms with panoramic TV screens. Housewives on the marble floors of this place and the many breathtaking creatures in their service do not hear. The owners of these mansions are very tough about the poor and there is no compromise. These are not the workers - they - if we do not see, they steal everything they've got. Even the locked layer for the refrigerator is somehow removed. They do not have to bend to work.
According to him, the poor are a plot against what they have got. More importantly, neo-rich are talking about the existence of the poor as an insult to their hard work. When other hands are busy with their lives walking in hand, they take a glass of alcohol in hand and sit at their home veranda, telling stories that are so cool with their friends today that they are so selfish and barbarous. As someone who was killed and killed by an elderly man for a fragile bang, 'the home guardist raped the child of the house,' as the driver ran away with the daughter of the house, etc., etc. People now have to assess me that people do not like to work on villages as they have a hundred days job guarantee every year.
Ideas affecting the future of the poor in the organized workshops or thinkers to form programs such as 'devotees for poverty eradication' do not form. Instead they are formed, in the bankruptcies of the palace, in the lobbying camps. Five hundred years ago, the poverty of poverty in Western countries has been preoccupied with the prejudices of everyone in the mouth and now sit on the lips of the nobles here. The ready knowledge from their imperial emperors is obliged to be grateful. Theoretical clothes of those who once become superior to themselves are so weighed down with awe.
While poverty is not an offense, it is a kind of practice, a kind of addiction; The poor have caused their poverty; The idea that their moral failings were the cause of their hardship was in the mood of the early economic days of industrialization. This view was intensified when the poor were embarked on factories, jails and rehabilitation centers. Today, there is no other corner of India, pure drinking water, no primary care service, but in the village where mobile phones and cocoa cola come to life, the people who have been born to live with the animals have eaten the dumplings of the rice, their brain has been contaminated, their humanity is denied. As it has been allocated, they are considered guilty as they have failed to live as a whole man. It is a strange attribute of the Anglo Saxons to impose guilt on the poor. It was created by industrialization; Continuing to be an avid person in the United States. This is one of the invisible imams of India. The British considered that India's poorest people could be used to suit their advantage. At the same time, British imperialism is lost, but in the mouth of the people who eat this country, as a symbol of its victory. The vast majority of India's poor people are considered to be the worst, not the victims of racist victims, but the zombies, the lame, who have written their own fateful fate. With this British dramatic theory, many decades of independence have come, Indian mind has not yet come out. Despite the loss of British socialism, the symbol of its conquest, the mouth of the people who eat this country, is in the mouth. The vast majority of India's poor people are considered to be the worst, not the victims of racist victims, but the zombies, the lame, who have written their own fateful fate. With this British dramatic theory, many decades of independence have come, Indian mind has not yet come out. Despite the loss of British socialism, the symbol of its conquest, the mouth of the people who eat this country, is in the mouth. The vast majority of India's poor people are considered to be the worst, not the victims of racist victims, but the zombies, the lame, who have written their own fateful fate. With this British dramatic theory, many decades of independence have come, Indian mind has not yet come out.
0 Comments