Oxfam (the Oxford Committee for Hunger Aid) is a global movement of people who want to eliminate the injustice of poverty. Over the years he has taken direct steps to reduce world poverty but at the same time he conducted research and research.
According to a recent study by Oxfam, the eight richest people have an equivalent half-planet heritage, which tells about three billion people. Everything is together. But this is not enough. Ninety-nine percent of the world's population is richer than others.
This scheme (the program, although promising poverty and confrontation with the United Nations) differs in the difference between the point of view of the economic point of the planet, but economists repeat for a long time: Guinea's coefficient increases.
The data in these financial statistics are certain inequality indices that provide a ratio between perfect equality curves and Lorenz curves and assume a value between 0 (for perfect equations) and 1 (for maximum inequality).
There are many examples of this information (and especially why). In Italy, it is not surprising to hear about the increase in the number of poor people. However, according to official data (according to those who are able to hide behind those who have renewed their invitations to the Italian government in the EU and IMF (recently the Italian government will continue to enforce restrictive measures based on the latest data as a result of combining system failures, average average wealth of the highest world in $ 25 million this year: Greece - And not other countries in the world Not enough), average wealth is even more. Most European countries, in Italy (Balkans and Eastern Europe, some the country has a lower range, that's 5 times 25 thousand dollars per year).
The fact is that the number of poor people does not constantly explain why there is an increase in growth on Bellpace.
Another example of how overall information dissemination in several Asian countries is: China and India are part of the second band with average per capita income. Even in India, the average income is between 5,000 and $ 10,000 per year. But poverty in this country is an epidemic that cannot be denied. The committee's findings include Prime Minister Narendra Modi who said: "The formation of another committee." After a year and a half of work, experts were told that the towel was thrown and recommended by sources (reports are always the Indian Transformation National Institution, which saw a copy of Aayog's policy, originating from the Hindustan Times influence newspaper)), But you won't bound to a technical impossibility.The reason for the unconditional surrender was "lack of agreement among its members": The government has long promised to end poverty. The whole world is in India. But poverty is full and relatively increasing.
But the amount cannot be explained: according to figures, the per capita income in this country is increasing. According to the OECD, India is experiencing extraordinary economic growth. But its superiority is distributed unevenly between states and social classes between cities and rural areas. In fact, the gap between the rich and the poor has increased dramatically over the past twenty years. And in almost every country in the same world.
In 2000, the United Nations Millennium Goals, the Millennium Goals, eradicated poverty. World Bank President Jim Yong Kim said in 2015 that "economic growth will reduce poverty" due to high growth rates in developing countries. I forgot to say that the extreme poverty line in 2015 was $ 1.9 billion. This means that daily income is less or equal to this amount, to be considered in full poverty. That year, however, decided to change this limit by bringing it to $ 1.20 per year, without valid reasons and without financial or economic stimulus. That is, the daily income of $ 1 dollars and those who have recently been considered absolute poverty no longer exist.
Ten percent of the world population (9.6) displays tricks that have made a big impact on the presentation of global data if in 2012, the population was 902 million (12.8 percent of the population), in 2015, becoming "only" 702 million.
So how do you explain how average income grows (and grows)? In fact, in the world, when the number of poor people continues to grow, wealth in the pockets of some people will increase. How Barnard Arnault (who has $ 54 billion), Larry Ellison ($ 54 billion), Mark Zuckerberg ("small" but "not explained" with assets worth $ 61 billion), Carlos Slim Hell (64 billion dollars, despite living in Mexico , one of the countries), Warren Buffett (76 billion dollars), Jeff Bezos (81 billion dollars), amansiyo Ortega(83 billion dollars, in this case the Spanish economy is clearly one of the top European countries) and finally the richest person in the world, with $ 88 billion in personal wealth from Bill Gates .
Their wealth is more than half the population on Earth. Democracy has become the three billionth richest person, in the world, but statistics and newspapers highlight failed to show that the poverty, rate is increasing.
Such democracy does not require a false neo-liberal theory (accordingly, unregulated openness for global markets leads to collective welfare for developing countries) but structural and social reforms are able to distribute the benefits of development to the masses .
0 Comments